Or, in the words of one commenter, let's call it a Boondoggle Pizza.
Let me explain.....
I grew up looking at this pyramid on the back of my cereal boxes:
This dietary triangle was originally developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, at the behest of producers of wheat, bread, cereal, and rice. Note that the government recommended between 6 and 11 servings of wheat, bread, cereal, and rice. Funny how that works.
If you followed the government's dietary advice, you got fat enough to have your own planets and gravitational system. Go here to read an earlier rant about the battles fought between Dr. Robert Atkins and the USDA. It features this glorious Atkins quote about the cause of American obesity:
There is no doubt in my mind that this increase in refined carbohydrates has been spurred by the media attention given to The Food Guide Pyramid, created by the U.S. Department Of Agriculture, which made 6-11 servings of wheat derivatives the basis of the pyramid. I believe that the Food Guide Pyramid's recommendations have directly contributed to the twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity we now face in this country.
(The food combinations that were recommended by the U.S.D.A.) are bad for your health, bad for your energy level, bad for your mental state, bad for your figure. Bad for your career prospects, bad for your sex life, bad for your digestion, bad for your blood chemistry, bad for your heart. What I'm saying is that they are bad.
Well said, Dr. Atkins. Well said. It was bad, bad, bad.
Shortly thereafter, the USDA came up with a new food pyramid that looked like this:
This set of dietary guidelines didn't last very long, mostly because the illustration didn't make a lick of sense.
The government obviously wanted to retain the "pyramid" concept, since they didn't want to back-pedal and admit killing so many Americans, but they needed something so vague that it would kill fewer people but still allow them to spend a lot of money on their pyramid scheme.
(You'll have to trust me that this is what it looked like. They've since scrubbed the site.)
Some of the accompanying propaganda still advocated a ridiculous amount of carbohydrates, but the percentage lowered considerably.
For a couple of years, the USDA didn't stack any more food into triangles.
And then came....THE FOOD PLATE !!!
Yes, we now have a USDA Food Plate. The pyramid has been leveled.
Here's Ed Morrisey on the new place-setting:
Wow, what a breakthrough! And if the food pyramid had any relevance to diet selection for Americans, it might even have been worth the two million dollars the USDA spent just to design the logo. Yes, that’s right, it cost taxpayers $2 million for someone to draw a circle, cut it into four quadrants, and then attach labels like FRUITS and VEGETABLES. The $2 million didn’t just go into the logo design, though. According to the New York Times, they spent part of that money doing focus-group testing on circles with two lines, and on a Web site, too — as if millions of people will thunder to it to plan their dinners.
And it's still waaaaaay heavy on the fruits and carbohydrates, but we have the Florida and Iowa primaries to consider.
You would think that the simple matter of what to eat would be (ahem) "Settled Science" by now.
They spent two million dollars designing a chart that looks like it was lifted from a Powerpoint slide.
Two million dollars.
Go here to read the USDA's bullshit about Climate Change.
Let me explain.....
I grew up looking at this pyramid on the back of my cereal boxes:
This dietary triangle was originally developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, at the behest of producers of wheat, bread, cereal, and rice. Note that the government recommended between 6 and 11 servings of wheat, bread, cereal, and rice. Funny how that works.
If you followed the government's dietary advice, you got fat enough to have your own planets and gravitational system. Go here to read an earlier rant about the battles fought between Dr. Robert Atkins and the USDA. It features this glorious Atkins quote about the cause of American obesity:
There is no doubt in my mind that this increase in refined carbohydrates has been spurred by the media attention given to The Food Guide Pyramid, created by the U.S. Department Of Agriculture, which made 6-11 servings of wheat derivatives the basis of the pyramid. I believe that the Food Guide Pyramid's recommendations have directly contributed to the twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity we now face in this country.
(The food combinations that were recommended by the U.S.D.A.) are bad for your health, bad for your energy level, bad for your mental state, bad for your figure. Bad for your career prospects, bad for your sex life, bad for your digestion, bad for your blood chemistry, bad for your heart. What I'm saying is that they are bad.
Well said, Dr. Atkins. Well said. It was bad, bad, bad.
Shortly thereafter, the USDA came up with a new food pyramid that looked like this:
This set of dietary guidelines didn't last very long, mostly because the illustration didn't make a lick of sense.
The government obviously wanted to retain the "pyramid" concept, since they didn't want to back-pedal and admit killing so many Americans, but they needed something so vague that it would kill fewer people but still allow them to spend a lot of money on their pyramid scheme.
(You'll have to trust me that this is what it looked like. They've since scrubbed the site.)
Some of the accompanying propaganda still advocated a ridiculous amount of carbohydrates, but the percentage lowered considerably.
For a couple of years, the USDA didn't stack any more food into triangles.
And then came....THE FOOD PLATE !!!
Yes, we now have a USDA Food Plate. The pyramid has been leveled.
Here's Ed Morrisey on the new place-setting:
Wow, what a breakthrough! And if the food pyramid had any relevance to diet selection for Americans, it might even have been worth the two million dollars the USDA spent just to design the logo. Yes, that’s right, it cost taxpayers $2 million for someone to draw a circle, cut it into four quadrants, and then attach labels like FRUITS and VEGETABLES. The $2 million didn’t just go into the logo design, though. According to the New York Times, they spent part of that money doing focus-group testing on circles with two lines, and on a Web site, too — as if millions of people will thunder to it to plan their dinners.
And it's still waaaaaay heavy on the fruits and carbohydrates, but we have the Florida and Iowa primaries to consider.
You would think that the simple matter of what to eat would be (ahem) "Settled Science" by now.
They spent two million dollars designing a chart that looks like it was lifted from a Powerpoint slide.
Two million dollars.
Go here to read the USDA's bullshit about Climate Change.