Whenever people start talking about regulating the Internet, it gives us pause.
Why would you want to regulate a communications and economic platform that has been such a roaring success and has had so few problems?
1) The government is filled with Student Council-type control freaks
2) The government has absolutely nothing to fear from the mainstream media (and yes, this includes the dreaded Fox News) but the internet has proven to be an effective means of exposing government skullduggery.
3) All other forms or unnecessary government regulation have created more government jobs. This regulatory project would do the same.
So the announcement last week by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski that the agency planned to assert authority over the Internet raises all kinds of red flags.
Hell yes, it raises red flags. Every street in America should look like one of Chairman Mao's Cultural Revolution Rallies.
Here's Harry Browne on government regulations in general and the FCC in particular:
There's absolutely no reason to have a Federal Communications Commission.
We don't need the FCC to apportion limited broadcast frequencies, because private companies will always find a way to accommodate whatever the market wants and needs.
We don't need the FCC to protect one company from infringing on another's frequency, because we already have police and courts who are supposed to protect property rights.
And we certainly don't need the FCC to protect us from people like Janet Jackson and Howard Stern, because private initiative has given us the remote control — the all-purpose self-censoring device that can keep out of our homes anything we find offensive.
But I'm sure that thousands of careers, tons of good entertainment, and billions of dollars have been sacrificed to the Great God of Government Regulation.
It's time to junk the FCC.
The red flag pic came from here. Censorship button from here. The