And yet... you, sir, allow your company to keep a child molester employed. What's up with that?
Which one? We have several. We also have some rapists, and at least one murderer. Plus, the number of employees who've been locked up for drug-related offenses is astounding. I'm not saying these offenses are equal, but these folks have paid their debt to society in prison, and in some cases are still paying their debt on parole, probation, and fees and fines. We currently have a President who, in his memoir, affirms that he smoked weed and did coke. He's moved on from that. I think. The guy nicknamed "The Lion Of The Senate" effectively murdered a young woman by driving off a bridge and into a river and leaving her to die. He didn't do any time. But he was able to move on. All of these wrongs don't make a right. But this is one of the reasons we believe that government should have a monopoly on "initiating" the use of force. We've decided that crime X is to be met with penalty Y. But no more than that. Bush II, John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Obama all smoked weed, or used stronger stuff. They paid no penalty to the state or society for doing so. We employ some registered sex offenders who have paid their penalty to the state and to society. So....what's your point??
Anon - this is becoming tedious. Are you suggesting that someone at Whited's office is committing a crime? If so, report it to the authorities. If you are talking about a past crime, then you should know that what you are doing is harassment - which is a crime. In fact, it is quite handy that you keep posting evidence of your harassment in a public forum, time stamped, and with all kinds of handy tracking information (you do know that blog metering applications provide identifying information, right?).
Harper,I've figured out who it is. One disgruntled ex-employee and one disgruntled current employee. With some guidance from a husband.
It's why I love my statcounter with the URL tracking. Heh.
Post a Comment