Ok, this is some good stuff. Please hang with me through the preliminary throat-clearing....
Here's The Economist magazine, formerly a cheerleader for Anthropogenic Global Warming, but now drifting toward well-founded skepticism for the second time in the last few months:
Here's The Economist magazine, formerly a cheerleader for Anthropogenic Global Warming, but now drifting toward well-founded skepticism for the second time in the last few months:
GLOBAL warming has slowed. The rate of warming of over the past 15 years has been lower than that of the preceding 20 years. There is no serious doubt that our planet continues to heat, but it has heated less than most climate scientists had predicted. Nate Cohn of the New Republic reports: "Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that seemed to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections".Read the whole thing if time permits, and remember the key sentence in that 2nd paragraph. The reality is that the already meagre prospects of these policies, in America at least, will be devastated if temperatures do fall outside the lower bound of the projections that environmentalists have used to create a panicked sense of emergency.
Mr Cohn does his best to affirm that the urgent necessity of acting to retard warming has not abated, as does Brad Plumer of the Washington Post, as does this newspaper. But there's no way around the fact that this reprieve for the planet is bad news for proponents of policies, such as carbon taxes and emissions treaties, meant to slow warming by moderating the release of greenhouse gases. The reality is that the already meagre prospects of these policies, in America at least, will be devastated if temperatures do fall outside the lower bound of the projections that environmentalists have used to create a panicked sense of emergency. Whether or not dramatic climate-policy interventions remain advisable, they will become harder, if not impossible, to sell to the public, which will feel, not unreasonably, that the scientific and media establishment has cried wolf.
Now we take you to Barack H. Obama, in full-blown Chicken Little mode. .
President Obama will announce Tuesday in a speech at Georgetown University that he plans to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from existing power plants, according to individuals who have been briefed on the plan but asked not to be identified.Remember this, children. Please, please, please remember this one thing. The damn weather isn't cooperating with the models. Climate isn't changing as predicted. Obama knows that if he's going to get in another expensive boondoggle for supporters, he has to act fast.
In a statement Saturday afternoon sent via the White House Twitter feed, Obama said that he plans to fulfill the pledge he made in his second inaugural address to “respond to the growing threat of climate change for the sake of our children and future generations.”
“This Tuesday, I’ll lay out my vision for where I believe we need to go — a national plan to reduce carbon pollution, prepare our country for the impacts of climate change, and lead global efforts to fight it,” the president said. “This is a serious challenge — but it’s one uniquely suited to America’s strengths.”
Here's some more of his statement. For "economic opportunities", you can safely substitute the word "graft". Or perhaps "kickbacks".
In Saturday’s statement, Obama emphasized the economic opportunities that could come from tackling carbon emissions.Ok, enough of that damn fool. Let's move on to another one, a senator from Hawaii.
“We’ll need scientists to design new fuels, and farmers to grow them,” he said. “We’ll need engineers to devise new sources of energy, and businesses to make and sell them.”
Senator Brian Schatz’s (D-HI) filed an amendment for the immigration bill Wednesday that would allow stateless people in the U.S. to seek conditional lawful status if their nations have been made uninhabitable by climate change.
I'll believe that I contribute to Climate Change when senator Brian Schatz’s (D-HI) starts travelling from Hawaii to D.C. in a canoe carved from a coconut tree. Christ Almighty, do these people have no sense of shame? At all?
Here's more.....
Again, let me be clear about what this amendment does. It simply recognizes that climate change, like war, is one of the most significant contributors to homelessness in the world. And like with states torn apart and made uninhabitable by war, we have an obligation not to deport people back to a country made uninhabitable by sea level rise and other extreme environmental changes that render these states desolate.
The sky isn't falling, people. It simply isn't. We have weather. Good, bad, and normal.
There is no crisis. But we're not going to let the non-crisis go to waste.
2 comments:
I don't remember the name of the person who posted this idea on another blog, but it was a great comment:
You know that global warming is nonsense when the recommended changes to alleviate it are the same as the recommended changes to alleviate global cooling (the climate worry of the 1970s).
Bah! Don't believe the global warming deniers!
Its totally happening!!!11!11
Donate to me today! And I'll rid the world of one of the most awful contributors to this impending disaster!
http://spootville.blogspot.com/2012/10/help-fight-against-global-warming.html
Post a Comment