Friday, August 5, 2011
Quote Of The Day, on Greed
I saw this little gem at the Libertarian News blog.
"It’s true: greed has had a very bad press. I frankly don’t see anything wrong with greed. I think that the people who are always attacking greed would be more consistent with their position if they refused their next salary increase." – Murray N. Rothbard
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Coincidence??
69% of Americans believe that it is likely that scientists have falsified Global Warming / Cooling / Climate Change research.
In related news, GM sold only 125 Chevy Volts last month.
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Why I love the war on drugs
I hire a lot of ex-convicts. Sometimes they are a bargain.
Think about it. Imagine a 25-year-old who would be making 50K per year in a just and fair world, based on his intelligence, computer skills, and work ethic. But suppose he got caught up in the George Bush/Barack Obama War On Drugs because of possession of a trifling amount of a weed, and he now has some prison time on his record.
He is now lucky to get minimum wage.
My company pays most people a lot more than minimum, but not for employees that no one else will hire. We sometimes can hire ex-convict geniuses for 9 bucks an hour.
If you're willing to put up with employees having to leave work at odd hours to waste time meeting with probation officers, parole officers, government counselors and other bureaucratic pygmies, ex-cons are a bargain.
It doesn't seem fair, does it? I get great employees for half-price !! Thank you Democrats !!!!
So what should be done about my unfair advantage? Well, a nation that didn't have its head up its collective ass would legalize marijuana use and possession, along with other victimless crimes. We have 6% of the world's population and 25% of its convicts. We do love turning our children into Food For The Machine.
San Francisco is now debating what to do about my discriminatory practices. Are they going to legalize marijuana in their city? Make it legal for entrepreneurs to sell plants without a permit?
Oh no. Nothing like that. They're going to leave all the current laws in place, but make it illegal for anyone to ask about convictions. I swear to God, that's the approach they're taking. Here's a quote from the Coyote Blog:
A legislative proposal in San Francisco seeks to make ex-cons and felons a protected class, along with existing categories of residents like African-Americans, people with disabilities and pregnant women. If passed by city supervisors, landlords and employers would be prohibited from asking applicants about their criminal past. [...]According to The City’s Human Rights Commission, San Francisco has the highest recidivism rate of any big city in California, almost 80 percent. With an influx of new prisoners set to be released because of the state’s budget crisis, supporters argue felons need legal protections before they’re disqualified simply because of their record, which could be decades old and for crimes that have nothing to do with the job they’re hoping to get.
Yep. They're going to continue ruining lives because, after all, jailers, probation officers, parole officers, counselors, border patrol guards, Narcs, and SWAT teams need jobs. But they're going to make it illegal to ask about it.
I love being alive, just for moments like this.
What 28 ounces of gold would purchase in 1916. And today.
From Tarrant County Libertarian Party Chair John Spivey's Facebook page:
Hey Federal Reserve fans! I just did some fun research - Shortly after the Fed was hatched, in 1916, Chevy released it's "Model-T Slayer", the 490! Very slick, this roadster with the optional "full electrical system" ran $550 or 28.9 ounces of gold. Today, the Chevy's roadster, the Camaro Convertible 2 SS with several fun options runs $47,145... or 28.3 OUNCES OF GOLD! ALMOST EXACTLY THE SAME!!!!!!
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
On "The Tea Party's War With America"
Joe Nocera has an editorial in The New York Holy Times that almost perfectly illustrates the difference between the Statist and Libertarian mindsets. Fisking the entire thing would grow tiresome, but the main points show up in the first few paragraphs.
Here's Mr. Nocera:
Here's Mr. Nocera:
You know what they say: Never negotiate with terrorists. It only encourages them.
You know what's coming after that, right? Yeah. The people who want more freedom for themselves and for others are "terrorists". To paraphrase an Instapundit commenter, "This has to be the first ‘Terrorist’ movement in the history of mankind that, if it gets everything it wants…will leave you the hell alone.”
Back to Mr. Nocera:These last few months, much of the country has watched in horror as the Tea Party Republicans have waged jihad on the American people.
Oh for the love of God. Washington D.C. has indebted every f-ing taxpayer with a $130,000.00 bar tab. The Statists want to increase that debt. They've already doubled the debt since Bill Clinton left office. The Tea Party Republicans have trotted out a 2.4 trillion in cuts (over 10 years), a 2.4 trillion that will be cut out of future increases, not from the current geysers of gloppy glutinous pork. And these people making the pitiful little efforts to reduce the spending are jihadists ????
Back to Mr. Nocera:
Their intransigent demands for deep spending cuts, coupled with their almost gleeful willingness to destroy one of America’s most invaluable assets, its full faith and credit, were incredibly irresponsible. But they didn’t care. Their goal, they believed, was worth blowing up the country for, if that’s what it took.
I, for one, don't want America to have any more credit. I want those Chinese bastards to stop mailing credit cards to Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner. I want it to stop now. I don't want my daughter to be burdened for the rest of her life with paying for George Bush and Barack Obama's ineffective wars on poverty, illiteracy, inflation, unemployment and brown people.
Seriously, can you imagine a credit card company sending a card application to a person whose debt was 100% of his yearly income?
Mr. Nocera thinks it would be a great idea. Otherwise, things would, er....change.
Like ideologues everywhere, they scorned compromise. When John Boehner, the House speaker, tried to cut a deal with President Obama that included some modest revenue increases, they humiliated him. After this latest agreement was finally struck on Sunday night — amounting to a near-complete capitulation by Obama — Tea Party members went on Fox News to complain that it only called for $2.4 trillion in cuts, instead of $4 trillion. It was head-spinning.
Well, numb-nuts, we are 14 trillion dollars in debt. A 4 trillion dollar cut over a ten year period is nothing. 2.4 trillion cut from a 10 year period doesn't even cover the defict of each year.
The "Tea Party" Republicans have suffered a hellish defeat. Despite all the howling and cloth-rending from the Statist side, nothing has changed. This is 100% business as usual.
There's no point in going further with this. Hit the link to read the rest of Nocera's editorial, in which he explains why taking money away from legit job producers and giving it to bureaucrats is the best way to end unemployment. Gag me with a dirty diaper.
Monday, August 1, 2011
Debt Ceiling Quote Of The Day
The Debt Ceiling should be renamed "The National Debt Target" - Peter Schiff
To understand that quote is to understand the nature of the problem.
Sunday, July 31, 2011
You're gonna pay !!!
This is the best thing I've seen on our habit of passing our bills on to the unborn. The clip of Harry Reid holding the little zygotes at gunpoint is classic.
Saturday, July 30, 2011
22 billion in cuts for this year !!! (Ahem....there's a 1.6 trillion dollar deficit this year.)
The much-discussed, now defeated Boehner Bill would have cut 22 billion dollars from this year's Federal spending.
22 billion is a lot of money, unless you tastelessly mention that this year's deficit is 1.6 trillion. (That's one thousand billions, plus 600 billions - if you have trouble with all the zeroes.)
I was looking for an illustration for this, something to show a comparison between 22 billion in cuts as compared to 1.6 trillion hole. I only found this:
The trifling amount of cuts for this year in the Boehner Bill are roughly equal to the amount we spend on hunting trips.
I couldn't find any pics of 1.6 trillion dollars. However, I found a list of what all you could do with a mere one trillion. Remember to compare the things on this list to the purchase of a tree stand, and to add another 60% to everything listed below....
If you stack up $1,000 bills, $1 trillion would need a pile that is 80 miles high.
$ 1 trillion is more than the combined gross revenues of Wal Mart, Exxon, General Motors and Ford Motors.
We could buy 16.6 million Habitat for Humanity houses
And in the long term, the Boehner Bill only cuts spending by 1.2 trillion over a ten-year period.
We are freakin' doomed.
Obi-Ron, you're our only hope....
Thursday, July 28, 2011
From Libertarian Reddit
Assorted pics from the Top 10 posts in Libertarian Reddit:
This quote is apocryphal, if I'm not mistaken. But if Alex D.T. didn't say it, then he should have:
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Coming Soon: The One Hundred Trillion Dollar Federal Reserve Note
This is a one hundred trillion dollar Federal Reserve Note. (It's from the Zimbabwe printing press, not the Bernanke Publishing Company.)
No one in Zimbabwe thought they would ever hold one of these.
The people who inflated Zimbabwe's currency to the point of uselessness claimed to be doing so for the good of The People.
This piece of paper isn't linked to anything of value, just like the U.S. currency isn't linked to anything of value.
Printing one hundred trillion-dollar banknotes creates massive problems for the general populace, but it solves problems for the elite few who run the government printing presses. Therefore, the elite few are going to run the shit out of the government printing presses.
Like Zimbabwe, the U.S. has very few safeguards in place to prevent someone from printing all the money they think we need, and using it to pay their buddies for stimulus packages, TARP plans, deficit non-reduction schemes, and the like.
It will happen here. Hide and watch.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Harry Browne, on Elitism
"The most ignorant person in the land still knows enough to come in out of the rain. The lowliest soul in America knows better than you do what would make him happy. How can you presume to set the rules of life for him - and to force everyone to obey your rules - and then have the audacity to claim that you're doing it for everyone's own good?" - Harry Browne
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Time to purge the photo files
Once again, it is time to purge the photo files. Here are the things I've saved from Libertarian Reddit, emails and elsewhere that I couldn't find an immediate use for:
Here's an excellent map of our foreign aid expenditures.
Here's a cool drawing of how to cut timber:
Greatest mugshot EVER:
That's all I've got this morning. Hope everyone has a great day.
Saturday, July 23, 2011
On reaching out
The BBC has published a list of the U.K.'s least favorite Americanisms.
It's a good list, since it includes "deliverables", "deplane", and "I could care less". ("I could care less" was once a sarcastic statement, but is now meaningless).
The most vile phrase mentioned is "reach out to" instead of "ask" or "call". It's number 35 on the list, and was suggested by a Londoner named Nerina.
"Reach out to" when the correct word is "ask". For example: "I will reach out to Kevin and let you know if that timing is convenient". Reach out? Is Kevin stuck in quicksand? Is he teetering on the edge of a cliff? Can't we just ask him?
Well said, Nerina. Well said. I get it all the time from salespeople who call my warehouses. "Whited, should I reach out to Aaron in your purchasing department about your need for fastening solutions?" (Fastening solutions are what we used to call nuts and bolts.)
"Whited, I'll reach out to Darin at your office about this."
"Do me a favor and reach out to Bentonville about the Wal-Mart shipment."
Grrrrrr.....
It makes the speaker sound as if he's a freakin' televangelist, reaching out to those who are lost without his product line. The next salesman to disturb my slumber at work, daring to say he wanted to reach out to me, I'm going to reach out to him with an email containing a link to this post.
Sir, evangelists reach out. First basemen reach out. Grocery stock clerks reach out, as do roofers, peanut salemen at ball games, firemen trying to get cats out of a tree, and politicians working rope lines.
Salesmen either call, ask, or contact. They are not God reaching out to Adam to give him the divine spark of life, their product line of fastening solutions, or low, low rates for shipments going to North Dakota on Thursdays.
Most of the other Americanisms on the list don't bother me as much. I could care less.
A Fresh Coat Of Whitening to Radley Balko for the link.
Friday, July 22, 2011
On having to ring up your own groceries but pay "full price"
I saw the following quote on Instapundit:
SEEN ON FACEBOOK: “I work all day, go to Kroger late night, stock up on groceries and then get to the checkout and have to scan and bag everything by myself and still pay full price while Kroger can eliminate a job. Hmmmmm. That’s the equivalent to you coming into my restaurant, cooking your own food and I still get to charge full price. Am I being unreasonable???”
I honestly don't know where to begin. For lack of a better place, let's start with the history of grocery stores.
If you ever find yourself in Memphis Tennessee with a couple of hours to kill, check out The Pink Palace museum. They've got a beautifully reconstructed model of a Piggly Wiggly grocery store inside.
Why? Piggly Wiggly (founded in Memphis) was the first self-serve grocery store in the U.S. Instead of handing the clerk behind the counter your list of groceries, if you were a Piggly Wiggly shopper, you took a cart or a basket and got your groceries all by yourself.
This move didn't save or create any jobs in the grocery industry. In fact, it eliminated them. But it saved a lot of money for consumers. This allowed them to eventually purchase more of other things instead of food: iPods, flatscreen TV's, or laptop computers, creating jobs in the iPod, TV and laptop industries.
Skip forward about a half century. Someone came up with a pattern of lines called a "barcode" that could be read by another device called a "scanner".
This move didn't create any jobs in the grocery industry. It made checking out much, much faster, and eliminated a lot of inventory and supply chain jobs in the grocery distribution system. But it saved a lot of money for consumers. This allowed them to eventually purchase more of other things instead of food: iPods, flatscreen TV's, or laptop computers, creating jobs in the iPod, TV and laptop industries.
By the time the scanners came along, the U.S. military had already been using a warehouse concept called "cross-docking" for quite some time. This is a warehouse design where incoming shipments are received on one side, outgoing shipments are shipped on the other, with minimal storage space in between. Minimal inventory is kept on hand in the warehouse at any given time.
Sam Walton, of Wal-Mart fame, was the first to apply this concept to the grocery and retail industry.
This move didn't create any jobs in the grocery industry. It made distribution much, much faster, and eliminated a lot of inventory and supply chain jobs in the grocery distribution system. But it saved a lot of money for consumers. This allowed them to eventually purchase more of other things instead of food: iPods, flatscreen TV's, or laptop computers, creating jobs in the iPod, TV and laptop industries.
Finally, someone invented the self-serve grocery checkout stand. If you have a minimal amount of stuff to ring up, you can choose to do it yourself.
As the Facebook commenter wrote, the customer is doing some of the work himself. Kind of like the Piggly Wiggly customer started doing in the 1920's.
This move toward self-checkout doesn't create any jobs in the grocery industry. It makes getting out of the store much, much faster, and it saves a lot of money for consumers. This allows them to eventually purchase more of other things instead of food: iPods, flatscreen TV's, or laptop computers, creating jobs in the iPod, TV and laptop industries.
I hope this has helped.
We have not become a prosperous nation by "saving or creating jobs". We have become a prosperous nation by constantly churning the process, always trying to come up with a better way to get things done.
No one can predict what the next way will be. No one knows which kid is working in the Produce Department of an Albertson's Grocery Store who has already come up with a better way to distribute and merchandise fruit and vegetables, and who just can't wait to open his own store and try out his idea. No one knows which computer geek in his Mom's basement has already come up with a system to make distribution and logistics more efficient.
These people are going to bring us improvements and levels of progress that we can't even imagine, here in the primitive year 2011.
The only thing we do know is that there will always be someone complaining about the cost of progress and doing everything in his power to keep it from happening.
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Rupert Murdoch attacked by pie assassin - Who will be the next victim?
It looks like Rupert Murdoch's media empire is infested with reporters who illegally hack into phones and emails.
Any reporter doing this in the U.S. should be locked up, and the key should be thrown away.
Here's a video of a protester trying to hit Murdoch with a pie during some testimony before Parliament. Murdoch's wife intervenes before the pie-chunker can get too close.
In the U.S., we're supposed to be protected from warrantless wiretaps by the Fourth Amendment:
The wording is straightfoward. Unless George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Karl Rove have a warrant, they don't have any business going through your papers or "effects". "Effects" would be your email or your cell phone.
But during the Bush administration, we went into a blind panic and surrendered our rights to some people who wanted to go through our stuff without a warrant. It was all for our own protection and safety.
And it continues. Here's the Wall Street Journal on Obama's "evolving" stance on listening to your conversations:
....we're beginning to wonder if the (Obama) White House has put David Addington, Mr. Cheney's chief legal aide, on retainer. The practical effect is to prevent the courts from reviewing the legality of the warrantless wiretapping program that Mr. Obama repeatedly claimed to find so heinous -- at least before taking office. Justice, by the way, is making the same state secrets argument in a separate lawsuit involving rendition and a Boeing subsidiary.
Hide the children, but we agree with Mr. Obama that the President has inherent Article II Constitutional powers that neither the judiciary nor statutes like FISA can impinge upon. The FISA appeals court said as much in a decision released in January, as did Attorney General Eric Holder during his confirmation hearings. It's reassuring to know the Administration is refusing to compromise core executive-branch prerogatives, especially on war powers.
....Then again, we are relearning that the "Imperial Presidency" is only imperial when the President is a Republican. Democrats who spent years denouncing George Bush for "spying on Americans" and "illegal wiretaps" are now conspicuously silent. Yet these same liberals are going ballistic about the Bush-era legal memos released this week. Cognitive dissonance is the polite explanation, and we wouldn't be surprised if Mr. Holder released them precisely to distract liberal attention from the Al-Haramain case.
Hit the link to read the whole thing.
So.... who would you rather have illegally listening to your phone calls and reading your emails? Rupert Murdoch or Barack Obama?
And is Michelle Obama prepared to step between Barack and a pie?
The pic of the Obama Pie came from here.
Any reporter doing this in the U.S. should be locked up, and the key should be thrown away.
Here's a video of a protester trying to hit Murdoch with a pie during some testimony before Parliament. Murdoch's wife intervenes before the pie-chunker can get too close.
In the U.S., we're supposed to be protected from warrantless wiretaps by the Fourth Amendment:
The wording is straightfoward. Unless George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Karl Rove have a warrant, they don't have any business going through your papers or "effects". "Effects" would be your email or your cell phone.
But during the Bush administration, we went into a blind panic and surrendered our rights to some people who wanted to go through our stuff without a warrant. It was all for our own protection and safety.
And it continues. Here's the Wall Street Journal on Obama's "evolving" stance on listening to your conversations:
....we're beginning to wonder if the (Obama) White House has put David Addington, Mr. Cheney's chief legal aide, on retainer. The practical effect is to prevent the courts from reviewing the legality of the warrantless wiretapping program that Mr. Obama repeatedly claimed to find so heinous -- at least before taking office. Justice, by the way, is making the same state secrets argument in a separate lawsuit involving rendition and a Boeing subsidiary.
Hide the children, but we agree with Mr. Obama that the President has inherent Article II Constitutional powers that neither the judiciary nor statutes like FISA can impinge upon. The FISA appeals court said as much in a decision released in January, as did Attorney General Eric Holder during his confirmation hearings. It's reassuring to know the Administration is refusing to compromise core executive-branch prerogatives, especially on war powers.
....Then again, we are relearning that the "Imperial Presidency" is only imperial when the President is a Republican. Democrats who spent years denouncing George Bush for "spying on Americans" and "illegal wiretaps" are now conspicuously silent. Yet these same liberals are going ballistic about the Bush-era legal memos released this week. Cognitive dissonance is the polite explanation, and we wouldn't be surprised if Mr. Holder released them precisely to distract liberal attention from the Al-Haramain case.
Hit the link to read the whole thing.
So.... who would you rather have illegally listening to your phone calls and reading your emails? Rupert Murdoch or Barack Obama?
And is Michelle Obama prepared to step between Barack and a pie?
The pic of the Obama Pie came from here.
Monday, July 18, 2011
Ok, whose turn is it this year to be the "responsible, small government party"?
This is from Weasel Zippers. A summary of the 2006 vote to raise the debt ceiling.
Please note how many small government Republican senators voted to put us further into debt.
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress — 2nd Session
As compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Question: On the Joint Resolution (H.J.Res.47 )
Vote Number: 54 Vote Date: March 16, 2006, 11:17 AM
A cynic might claim that our two political factions enjoy taking turns.
Please note how many small government Republican senators voted to put us further into debt.
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress — 2nd Session
As compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Question: On the Joint Resolution (H.J.Res.47 )
Vote Number: 54 Vote Date: March 16, 2006, 11:17 AM
A cynic might claim that our two political factions enjoy taking turns.
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies." - Barack Obama, 2006
Sunday, July 17, 2011
And so it begins....
For the few die-hards who think there's a difference between the Republicrats and the Demoblicans, go here. Please. Hit the link. And don't even think about acting surprised by what you read.
This means you, Harper !! :)
As long as we keep doing what we're doing, we're going to keep getting what we've been getting: debt, wars, needless regulation, bureaucracy, half the world's prisoners, violence on the border, Barack Obama regulating bedroom behavior, increasingly worthless currency, import quotas, high school graduates who've never read a book, and entitlements from hell.
The Republicans have worked hand in hand with their co-dependents to raise the debt floor ceiling before the current move to put in a new debt floor ceiling 70 times (so far).
Leopards don't change their spots. They do what they do. Don't be distracted by all the hand-wringing and scenery-chewing. It is as scripted as a production of Hamlet.
Just enjoy watching them get your grandchildren further and further into debt.
This means you, Harper !! :)
As long as we keep doing what we're doing, we're going to keep getting what we've been getting: debt, wars, needless regulation, bureaucracy, half the world's prisoners, violence on the border, Barack Obama regulating bedroom behavior, increasingly worthless currency, import quotas, high school graduates who've never read a book, and entitlements from hell.
The Republicans have worked hand in hand with their co-dependents to raise the debt
Leopards don't change their spots. They do what they do. Don't be distracted by all the hand-wringing and scenery-chewing. It is as scripted as a production of Hamlet.
Just enjoy watching them get your grandchildren further and further into debt.
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Welcome Back Carter
It was 32 years ago today.
Jimmy Carter gave his infamous "malaise" speech.
It actually holds up pretty well, but nobody was in the mood for it at the time.
No one wants to listen to sanctimonious hectoring about shared sacrifice from someone widely perceived as the root cause of the need for shared sacrifice.
Here's a Jimmy Carter/Barry Obama mashup, assembled by some genius from the Laura Ingraham show.
Jimmy Carter gave his infamous "malaise" speech.
It actually holds up pretty well, but nobody was in the mood for it at the time.
No one wants to listen to sanctimonious hectoring about shared sacrifice from someone widely perceived as the root cause of the need for shared sacrifice.
Here's a Jimmy Carter/Barry Obama mashup, assembled by some genius from the Laura Ingraham show.
Friday, July 15, 2011
The Fix Is In
Ron Paul is now hitting the airwaves with this video rant about the debt ceiling.
I'm afraid it is too late. Boehner and Obama have met in private, and that's enough to guarantee that the fix is in.
When time permits, go to Vegas and try to place a bet that the government WILL raise the debt ceiling.
They'll laugh you all the way to Miami. Nobody in his right mind would take that action.
I'm afraid it is too late. Boehner and Obama have met in private, and that's enough to guarantee that the fix is in.
When time permits, go to Vegas and try to place a bet that the government WILL raise the debt ceiling.
They'll laugh you all the way to Miami. Nobody in his right mind would take that action.
Thursday, July 14, 2011
In which Ron Paul gets Ben Bernanke to say that gold ain't money
Here's the most amazing video you'll ever see.
It explains why the stimulus didn't "work", other than in its intended purpose of helping Bernanke's buddies.
It explains why prices are rising.
It explains why our national debt is rising.
It reminds me of Clarence Darrow grilling William Jennings Bryan at the Scopes Monkey Trial.
It explains why the stimulus didn't "work", other than in its intended purpose of helping Bernanke's buddies.
It explains why prices are rising.
It explains why our national debt is rising.
It reminds me of Clarence Darrow grilling William Jennings Bryan at the Scopes Monkey Trial.
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
An apology for posting inaccurate information
I've probably posted this (inaccurate) chart a dozen times, and regret doing so.
It shows public education spending going through the roof, while test scores remain flat.
The cost of public education has indeed increased as shown.
My mistake was in assuming that the miserable flatlined test scores were accurate.
Here's why I was wrong:
In the Atlanta Public School system, the administration held "cheating parties", in which they met at a teacher's home to change test scores.
A similar thing happened in Pontiac, Michigan.
Here's more on the Atlanta mess:
The chart is inaccurate.
Test scores have not remained flat despite the spending increases. If Michigan and Georgia are any indication of what's going on in government schools, test scores have declined.
My bad.
Go here to read an outraged editorial about the pro-choice movement that wants to privatize the public schools and give students and parents some other options.
It shows public education spending going through the roof, while test scores remain flat.
The cost of public education has indeed increased as shown.
My mistake was in assuming that the miserable flatlined test scores were accurate.
Here's why I was wrong:
In the Atlanta Public School system, the administration held "cheating parties", in which they met at a teacher's home to change test scores.
A similar thing happened in Pontiac, Michigan.
Here's more on the Atlanta mess:
Teachers and principals erased and corrected mistakes on students’ answer sheets.So. I humbly repent of publishing that chart so many times.
Area superintendents silenced whistle-blowers and rewarded subordinates who met academic goals by any means possible.
Superintendent Beverly Hall and her top aides ignored, buried, destroyed or altered complaints about misconduct, claimed ignorance of wrongdoing and accused naysayers of failing to believe in poor children’s ability to learn.
....For teachers, a culture of fear ensured the deception would continue.
“APS is run like the mob,” one teacher told investigators, saying she cheated because she feared retaliation if she didn’t.
The voluminous report names 178 educators, including 38 principals, as participants in cheating. More than 80 confessed. The investigators said they confirmed cheating in 44 of 56 schools they examined.
The chart is inaccurate.
Test scores have not remained flat despite the spending increases. If Michigan and Georgia are any indication of what's going on in government schools, test scores have declined.
My bad.
Go here to read an outraged editorial about the pro-choice movement that wants to privatize the public schools and give students and parents some other options.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Some info on Michele Bachmann's "Re-Closeting" Clinic and the values conveyed by Jewish and Christian scripture
From ABC News comes this account of Michele and Marcus Bachmann's counseling center, a business that will help lead gay and lesbian clients back into the closet:
Abraham had 3 wives - Sarah, Hagar and Keturah
"Now Sarai Abram's wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar." Genesis 16:1
"And Sarai Abram's wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife." Genesis 16:3
"Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah." Genesis 25:1
Here's a brief summary of the marital career of King David, who made Newt Gingrich look like an amateur. David had at least 18 wives - Michal, Abigail, Ahinoam of Jezreel, Eglah, Maacah, Abital, Haggith, and Bathsheba, and "10 women/concubines"
"Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife." 1 Samuel 18:27. (See also 1 Samuel 19:11-18; 25:44; and 2 Samuel 3:13-14; 6:20-23.)
"David sent and communed with Abigail, to take her to him to wife. 1 Samuel 25:39
"David also took Ahinoam of Jezreel; and they were also both of them his wives." 1 Samuel 25:43
"But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife," 1 Samuel 25:44
"Absalom the son of Maacah the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur;" 2 Samuel 3:3
"And the fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith; and the fifth, Shephatiah the son of Abital; And the sixth, Ithream, by Eglah David's wife. These were born to David in Hebron." 2 Samuel 3:4-5
"And David took him more concubines and wives" 2 Samuel 5:13, 1 Chronicles 14:3
"And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man. Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee out of the hand of Saul; And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things." 2 Samuel 12:7-8
"And David comforted Bathsheba his wife..." 2 Samuel 12:24
"And the king went forth, and all his household after him. And the king left ten women, which were concubines, to keep the house." 2 Samuel 15:16. (See also 2 Samuel 16:21-23.)
If you're reading this rant in a U.S. hotel room, chances are there's a Gideon Bible in the nightstand. Here's an account of Gideon's record as a Baby-Daddy:
"And Gideon had threescore and ten sons of his body begotten: for he had many wives." Judges 8:30
Here's the wife count for Abraham's grandson Jacob, who had 4 Wives - Leah, Rachel, Bilhah and Zilpah:
"And it came to pass in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter, and brought her to him; and he went in unto her." Genesis 29:23
"And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also." Genesis 29:28
"And she gave him Bilhah her handmaid to wife: and Jacob went in unto her." Genesis 30:4
"When Leah saw that she had left bearing, she took Zilpah her maid, and gave her Jacob to wife." Genesis 30:9
And here's what Vander Plaat missed on racial justice and gender equality:
Deuteronomy 21:10-14 "When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife; Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her."
Deuteronomy 20:14 "But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself"
And if you do go out and capture some foreigners, for god's sake please get 'em circumcised:
Genesis 17:13 "He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant."
Genesis 17:27 "And all the men of his house, born in the house, and bought with money of the stranger, were circumcised with him."
Mr. Vander Plaats and Mrs. Bachman, those are the traditional values conveyed by Jewish and Christian scripture.
Those traditionas are wrong. It's that simple. They aren't wisdom, they aren't just, they aren't humane. They're wrong. Humans shouldn't own each other. It's wrong. Men shouldn't own women. That is wrong. I don't believe that it makes sense for someone to have 40 wives. I don't think you believe it either.
Those teachings aren't inspired. They're the best that we could do at the time, based on what we knew.
It's time to out grow them, not just on slavery and racism, but on the rights of our gay and lesbian friends.
I almost forgot this one. Mr. Bachman, why are you letting Michele out of the house so much?
Here's what happened when God saw that Eve had eaten from the Tree Of Knowledge, bringing sin into the world.
Genesis 3:16 "To the woman, the Lord God said 'I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
A former patient who sought help from the Christian counseling clinic owned by GOP presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann and her husband, Marcus, told ABC News he was advised that prayer could rid him of his homosexual urges and he could eventually be "re-oriented."Here's why the Bachmann campaign is getting so much attention on this issue. There's a guy in Iowa named Bob Vander Plaats who has gotten a few Republican candidates to sign a "pledge" affirming their belief in heterosexual marriage, the Defense Of Marriage Act, opposition to Sharia Law, and the like. The "pledge" begins with the following preamble:
"[One counselor's] path for my therapy would be to read the Bible, pray to God that I would no longer be gay," said Andrew Ramirez, who was 17-years-old at the time he sought help from Bachmann & Associates in suburban Minneapolis in 2004. "And God would forgive me if I were straight."
In the past, Marcus Bachmann has disputed the clinic has treated gay patients this way. But Ramirez's account, which was first reported by The Nation, is similar to the counseling session that appears on new undercover video shot by a gay rights advocacy group last month. That footage shows another counselor at the Bachmann clinic telling a gay man posing as a patient that, with prayer and effort, he could eventually learn to be attracted to women and rid himself of his gay urges.
Faithful monogamy is at the very heart of a designed and purposeful order - as conveyed by Jewish and Christian Scripture, by Classical Philosophers, by Natural Law, and by the American Founders - upon which our concepts of Creator-endowed human rights, racial justice and gender equality all depend.Does Bob Vander Plaats not own a Bible? And if so, has he ever cracked the cover? Please allow me to climb into the pulpit of the sepulchre for today's scripture readings, helpfully assembled by a website called BiblicalPolygamy.com:
Abraham had 3 wives - Sarah, Hagar and Keturah
"Now Sarai Abram's wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar." Genesis 16:1
"And Sarai Abram's wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife." Genesis 16:3
"Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah." Genesis 25:1
Here's a brief summary of the marital career of King David, who made Newt Gingrich look like an amateur. David had at least 18 wives - Michal, Abigail, Ahinoam of Jezreel, Eglah, Maacah, Abital, Haggith, and Bathsheba, and "10 women/concubines"
"Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife." 1 Samuel 18:27. (See also 1 Samuel 19:11-18; 25:44; and 2 Samuel 3:13-14; 6:20-23.)
"David sent and communed with Abigail, to take her to him to wife. 1 Samuel 25:39
"David also took Ahinoam of Jezreel; and they were also both of them his wives." 1 Samuel 25:43
"But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife," 1 Samuel 25:44
"Absalom the son of Maacah the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur;" 2 Samuel 3:3
"And the fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith; and the fifth, Shephatiah the son of Abital; And the sixth, Ithream, by Eglah David's wife. These were born to David in Hebron." 2 Samuel 3:4-5
"And David took him more concubines and wives" 2 Samuel 5:13, 1 Chronicles 14:3
"And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man. Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee out of the hand of Saul; And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things." 2 Samuel 12:7-8
"And David comforted Bathsheba his wife..." 2 Samuel 12:24
"And the king went forth, and all his household after him. And the king left ten women, which were concubines, to keep the house." 2 Samuel 15:16. (See also 2 Samuel 16:21-23.)
If you're reading this rant in a U.S. hotel room, chances are there's a Gideon Bible in the nightstand. Here's an account of Gideon's record as a Baby-Daddy:
"And Gideon had threescore and ten sons of his body begotten: for he had many wives." Judges 8:30
Here's the wife count for Abraham's grandson Jacob, who had 4 Wives - Leah, Rachel, Bilhah and Zilpah:
"And it came to pass in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter, and brought her to him; and he went in unto her." Genesis 29:23
"And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also." Genesis 29:28
"And she gave him Bilhah her handmaid to wife: and Jacob went in unto her." Genesis 30:4
"When Leah saw that she had left bearing, she took Zilpah her maid, and gave her Jacob to wife." Genesis 30:9
And here's what Vander Plaat missed on racial justice and gender equality:
Deuteronomy 21:10-14 "When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife; Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her."
Deuteronomy 20:14 "But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself"
And if you do go out and capture some foreigners, for god's sake please get 'em circumcised:
Genesis 17:13 "He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant."
Genesis 17:27 "And all the men of his house, born in the house, and bought with money of the stranger, were circumcised with him."
Mr. Vander Plaats and Mrs. Bachman, those are the traditional values conveyed by Jewish and Christian scripture.
Those traditionas are wrong. It's that simple. They aren't wisdom, they aren't just, they aren't humane. They're wrong. Humans shouldn't own each other. It's wrong. Men shouldn't own women. That is wrong. I don't believe that it makes sense for someone to have 40 wives. I don't think you believe it either.
Those teachings aren't inspired. They're the best that we could do at the time, based on what we knew.
It's time to out grow them, not just on slavery and racism, but on the rights of our gay and lesbian friends.
I almost forgot this one. Mr. Bachman, why are you letting Michele out of the house so much?
Here's what happened when God saw that Eve had eaten from the Tree Of Knowledge, bringing sin into the world.
Genesis 3:16 "To the woman, the Lord God said 'I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
Monday, July 11, 2011
Can you spot the difference between the genuine and the fake $100 bills?
This is a counterfeit $100 bill.
Counterfeiters are printing them in China, and they are virtually indistinguishable from the ones that The Fed prints over on Blue Mound Road in Fort Worth.
The FBI is working with the Secret Service to figure out how to stop these guys. According to an agent that I met at a wedding, they're magnifying these fake bills to the size of a basketball court, and trying to detect little mistakes that will help distinguish these fakes from the real thing.
This counterfeit money isn't backed by any commodity (gold, silver, etc.) and it could wreak havoc on our economy.
This is a genuine $100 bill.
There is almost no way to distinguish this one from the Chinese counterfeit one. It isn't backed by any commodity (gold, silver, etc.) and it could wreak havoc on our economy.
If you take either of these to a bank, you can swap them for 100 pictures of George Washington, or 20 pictures of Abraham Lincoln, or 5 pictures of Andrew Jackson. The bank will not give you any gold or silver in exchange for them. They are only worth what people think they're worth.
Chinese counterfeiters and Ben Bernanke are both paying their bills with worthless paper. All discussions of the new debt ceiling are fundamentally silly, because we've been paying our debts with worthless paper for about 35 years.
In the meantime, don't bother looking at your paper money very closely. All of it is fake.
Counterfeiters are printing them in China, and they are virtually indistinguishable from the ones that The Fed prints over on Blue Mound Road in Fort Worth.
The FBI is working with the Secret Service to figure out how to stop these guys. According to an agent that I met at a wedding, they're magnifying these fake bills to the size of a basketball court, and trying to detect little mistakes that will help distinguish these fakes from the real thing.
This counterfeit money isn't backed by any commodity (gold, silver, etc.) and it could wreak havoc on our economy.
This is a genuine $100 bill.
There is almost no way to distinguish this one from the Chinese counterfeit one. It isn't backed by any commodity (gold, silver, etc.) and it could wreak havoc on our economy.
If you take either of these to a bank, you can swap them for 100 pictures of George Washington, or 20 pictures of Abraham Lincoln, or 5 pictures of Andrew Jackson. The bank will not give you any gold or silver in exchange for them. They are only worth what people think they're worth.
Chinese counterfeiters and Ben Bernanke are both paying their bills with worthless paper. All discussions of the new debt ceiling are fundamentally silly, because we've been paying our debts with worthless paper for about 35 years.
In the meantime, don't bother looking at your paper money very closely. All of it is fake.
Saturday, July 9, 2011
Charlie Rangel thinks that Jesus would get Caesar involved....
Here are some theological musings from noted tax cheat Charlie Rangel, via CNN:
Washington (CNN) - Veteran Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel made an impassioned plea to religious leaders Friday, calling on them to lobby members of Congress and the Obama administration to remember the "lesser of my brothers and sisters" during this weekend's debt negotiations.
"What would Jesus do this weekend? Or Moses. Or Allah. Or anyone else," the New York congressman said at a press conference on Capitol Hill. "I don't want this book (debt negotiations) closed without the clergy having an opportunity to forcefully express themselves as well as I know they can do."
The idea of Jesus getting his Galilean disciples to agitate for King Herod's favorite projects has always made me break out in giggles. (Check out Jim Wallis and Sojourners to learn more about the concept.)
To reach this level of gullibility, one has to assume that government is always good, and that stated intentions eliminate all other outcomes, and that the wisdom and administrative expertise of Charlie Rangel is enough to cancel the need for any other options for the "lesser of my brothers and sisters".
Top congressional leaders and the White House have been steeped in contentious negotiations over raising the nation's $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.Treasury Department officials, along with top economists, warn that a failure to raise the limit by August 2 could lead to a global economic crisis and dire consequences for the U.S., including skyrocketing interest rates and a falling dollar.
Rangel said he was stumped as to why Washington wouldn't be "besieged by spiritual leaders saying 'do what you have to do - but not to the homeless, the jobless and the helpless. Not to the sick. And certainly not to the aging that are sick or those depending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.'"
"And certainly not the 60,000 troops we have who aren't fighting the Russians in Europe, but are stationed there anyway. Or the 45,000 we have who are not fighting the North Koreans in South Korea. Or the hundreds of thousands of black males who are living in cages because they violated marijuana prohibitions, but whose feeding and maintenance and after-care supervision creates tens of thousands of government jobs. Or the tens of thousands of bureaucrats in the useless departments of Education and Energy. We want to decrease my grandchildren's debt, but not on the backs of those worthy people."
"I have not heard from those people who have been called by God to protect the poor. I haven't heard them," he said. "The issues that are going to be discussed this weekend involve spiritual, moral issues."
And Rangel's plea to the poor and helpless? Call your religious leaders and ask, "what is Medicare all about? What is Medicaid all about? Why do we have taxes?'"
Great question, Charlie. Great question. We have taxes so you can take your cut off the top, and funnel the rest to your supporters in the name of helping "the least of these, my brethren".
Here's my favorite song on the topic. I really need to get the YouTube done on this thing.
Washington (CNN) - Veteran Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel made an impassioned plea to religious leaders Friday, calling on them to lobby members of Congress and the Obama administration to remember the "lesser of my brothers and sisters" during this weekend's debt negotiations.
"What would Jesus do this weekend? Or Moses. Or Allah. Or anyone else," the New York congressman said at a press conference on Capitol Hill. "I don't want this book (debt negotiations) closed without the clergy having an opportunity to forcefully express themselves as well as I know they can do."
The idea of Jesus getting his Galilean disciples to agitate for King Herod's favorite projects has always made me break out in giggles. (Check out Jim Wallis and Sojourners to learn more about the concept.)
To reach this level of gullibility, one has to assume that government is always good, and that stated intentions eliminate all other outcomes, and that the wisdom and administrative expertise of Charlie Rangel is enough to cancel the need for any other options for the "lesser of my brothers and sisters".
Top congressional leaders and the White House have been steeped in contentious negotiations over raising the nation's $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.Treasury Department officials, along with top economists, warn that a failure to raise the limit by August 2 could lead to a global economic crisis and dire consequences for the U.S., including skyrocketing interest rates and a falling dollar.
Rangel said he was stumped as to why Washington wouldn't be "besieged by spiritual leaders saying 'do what you have to do - but not to the homeless, the jobless and the helpless. Not to the sick. And certainly not to the aging that are sick or those depending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.'"
"And certainly not the 60,000 troops we have who aren't fighting the Russians in Europe, but are stationed there anyway. Or the 45,000 we have who are not fighting the North Koreans in South Korea. Or the hundreds of thousands of black males who are living in cages because they violated marijuana prohibitions, but whose feeding and maintenance and after-care supervision creates tens of thousands of government jobs. Or the tens of thousands of bureaucrats in the useless departments of Education and Energy. We want to decrease my grandchildren's debt, but not on the backs of those worthy people."
"I have not heard from those people who have been called by God to protect the poor. I haven't heard them," he said. "The issues that are going to be discussed this weekend involve spiritual, moral issues."
And Rangel's plea to the poor and helpless? Call your religious leaders and ask, "what is Medicare all about? What is Medicaid all about? Why do we have taxes?'"
Great question, Charlie. Great question. We have taxes so you can take your cut off the top, and funnel the rest to your supporters in the name of helping "the least of these, my brethren".
Here's my favorite song on the topic. I really need to get the YouTube done on this thing.
"Jesus taught the multitudes one day in Galilee,
Must have been five thousand, and they all got hungry....
Disciples came to Jesus, and said "Get those people fed.
Jesus turned toward heaven, and this is what he said:
(bass) And he said
Let's get Caesar involved !
Caesar will get your problem solved.
Go away and let me relax, that's why I pay all that tax,
You need to get Caesar involved.
Three men saw a traveller that thieves had robbed and beat.
Two men were too busy, but one man stopped to speak
"Buddy that looks painful, yeah sometimes life's a bitch.
Samaritans no longer pull your ass out of the ditch....."
(bass) They just say...
Let's get Caesar involved !
He will get the problem solved.
I used to go the second mile, but in your case I think that I'll
Just try to get Caesar involved.
A wedding feast in Cana had just run out of wine,
The groom, he came to Jesus, and said make us some moonshine...
But Jesus had no permits, nor a license to distill,
So he said I can't help you, boy but I know one who will
(bass) And he said
Let's get Caesar involved !
The government will get the problem solved.
Give to Caesar what is his, next you'll give him all their is,
So let's get Caesar involved.
So if you're on life's highway, burdened with sin and shame,
Just call on Big Brother, just call out his name....
Don't call out for your neighbor, or friends and family,
They will just refer you to Washington, D.C.,
(bass) And they'll say
Let's get Caesar involved !
The empire will get the problem solved.
If you find that you can't cope, call on Mr. Change and Hope....
That you can get Caesar involved.
(Repeat chorus forever and ever, praising Caesar, King Herod, and Charlie Rangel, and thanking them for their great and glorious works.)
Must have been five thousand, and they all got hungry....
Disciples came to Jesus, and said "Get those people fed.
Jesus turned toward heaven, and this is what he said:
(bass) And he said
Let's get Caesar involved !
Caesar will get your problem solved.
Go away and let me relax, that's why I pay all that tax,
You need to get Caesar involved.
Three men saw a traveller that thieves had robbed and beat.
Two men were too busy, but one man stopped to speak
"Buddy that looks painful, yeah sometimes life's a bitch.
Samaritans no longer pull your ass out of the ditch....."
(bass) They just say...
Let's get Caesar involved !
He will get the problem solved.
I used to go the second mile, but in your case I think that I'll
Just try to get Caesar involved.
A wedding feast in Cana had just run out of wine,
The groom, he came to Jesus, and said make us some moonshine...
But Jesus had no permits, nor a license to distill,
So he said I can't help you, boy but I know one who will
(bass) And he said
Let's get Caesar involved !
The government will get the problem solved.
Give to Caesar what is his, next you'll give him all their is,
So let's get Caesar involved.
So if you're on life's highway, burdened with sin and shame,
Just call on Big Brother, just call out his name....
Don't call out for your neighbor, or friends and family,
They will just refer you to Washington, D.C.,
(bass) And they'll say
Let's get Caesar involved !
The empire will get the problem solved.
If you find that you can't cope, call on Mr. Change and Hope....
That you can get Caesar involved.
(Repeat chorus forever and ever, praising Caesar, King Herod, and Charlie Rangel, and thanking them for their great and glorious works.)
Friday, July 8, 2011
Having great hair isn't enough
Texas governor Rick Perry has been getting a lot of attention as a potential Republicrat candidate for President of The United States.
Unbelievable. Just because he has wonderful, wonderful hair and he says all the right things about Jesus doesn't mean he has any qualifications to be president in these difficult times. I can't remember anything in government that he has significantly cut, eliminated, or reduced.
One other thing....Perry once served as Al Gore's Texas Campaign Manager. If we had a reading, thinking populace, this factoid alone would give Perry the same electoral chances as Casey Anthony.
Here's Big Daddy John Spivey, chair of the Tarrant County Libertarian Party, on why Governor Goodhair isn't a good idea. This is from the Spivey Facebook page.
#1 Rick Perry is a “big government” politician. When Rick Perry became the governor of Texas in ...2000, the total spending by the Texas state government was approximately $ 49 billion. Ten years later it was approximately $ 90 billion. That is not exactly reducing the of government.
#2 The debt of the state of Texas is out of control. According to usdebtclock.org, the debt to GDP ratio in Texas is 22.9% and the debt per citizen is $ 10,645. In California (a total financial basket case), the debt to GDP ratio is just 18.7% and the debt per citizen is only $ 9932. If Rick Perry runs for president these are numbers he will want to keep well hidden.
#3 The total debt of the Texas government has more than doubled since Rick Perry became governor. So what would the U.S. national debt look like after four (or eight) years of Rick Perry?
#4 Rick Perry has spearheaded the effort to lease roads in Texas to foreign companies, to turn roads that are already free to drive on into toll roads, and to develop the Trans-Texas Corridor which would be part of the planned NAFTA superhighway system. If you really do deep research on this whole Trans-Texas Corridor nonsense you will see why no American should ever cast a single vote for Rick Perry.
#5 Rick Perry claims that he has a “track record” of not raising taxes. That is a false claim. Rick Perry has repeatedly raised taxes and fees while he has been governor. Today, Texans are faced with significantly higher taxes and fees than they were before Rick Perry was elected.
#6 Even with the oil boom in Texas, 23 states have a lower unemployment rate than Texas does.
#7 Back in 1988, Rick Perry supported Al Gore for president. In fact, Rick Perry actually served as Al Gore’s campaign chairman in the state of Texas that year.
#8 Between December 2007 and April 2011, weekly wages in the U.S. increased by about 5 percent. In the state of Texas they increased by just 0.6% over that same time period.
#9 Texas now has one of the worst education systems in the nation. The following is from an opinion piece that was actually authored by Barbara Bush earlier this year….
• We rank 36th in the nation in high school graduation rates. An estimated 3.8 million Texans do not have a high school diploma.
• We rank 49th in verbal SAT scores, 47th in literacy and 46th in average math SAT scores.
• We rank 33rd in the nation on teacher salaries.
#10 Rick Perry attended the Bilderberg Group meetings in 2007 and 2011. Associating himself with that organization should be a red flag for all American voters.
#11 Texas has the highest percentage of workers making minimum wage out of all 50 states.
#12 Rick Perry often gives speeches about illegal immigration, but when you look at the facts, he has been incredibly soft on the issue. If Rick Perry does not plan to secure the border, then he should not be president because illegal immigration is absolutely devastating many areas of the southwest United States.
#13 In 2007, 221,000 residents of Texas were making minimum wage or less. By 2010, that number had risen to 550,000.
#14 Rick Perry actually issued an executive order in 2007 that would have forced almost every single girl in the state of Texas to receive the Gardasil vaccine before entering the sixth grade. Perry would have put parents in a position where they would have had to fill out an application and beg the government not to inject their child with an untested and unproven vaccine. Since then, very serious safety issues regarding this vaccine have come to light. Fortunately, lawmakers in Texas blocked what Perry was trying to do. According to Wikipedia, many were troubled when “apparent financial connections between Merck and Perry were reported by news outlets, such as a $ 6,000 campaign contribution and Merck’s hiring of former Perry Chief of Staff Mike Toomey to handle its Texas lobbying work.”
Texas is doing well because our state constitution limits the power of the governor, and our legislature only meets every two years (they somehow managed to write 1500 laws while in session last time, but you get my point).
Rick Perry is at least smart enough to ride the wave without screwing it up.
Unbelievable. Just because he has wonderful, wonderful hair and he says all the right things about Jesus doesn't mean he has any qualifications to be president in these difficult times. I can't remember anything in government that he has significantly cut, eliminated, or reduced.
One other thing....Perry once served as Al Gore's Texas Campaign Manager. If we had a reading, thinking populace, this factoid alone would give Perry the same electoral chances as Casey Anthony.
Here's Big Daddy John Spivey, chair of the Tarrant County Libertarian Party, on why Governor Goodhair isn't a good idea. This is from the Spivey Facebook page.
#1 Rick Perry is a “big government” politician. When Rick Perry became the governor of Texas in ...2000, the total spending by the Texas state government was approximately $ 49 billion. Ten years later it was approximately $ 90 billion. That is not exactly reducing the of government.
#2 The debt of the state of Texas is out of control. According to usdebtclock.org, the debt to GDP ratio in Texas is 22.9% and the debt per citizen is $ 10,645. In California (a total financial basket case), the debt to GDP ratio is just 18.7% and the debt per citizen is only $ 9932. If Rick Perry runs for president these are numbers he will want to keep well hidden.
#3 The total debt of the Texas government has more than doubled since Rick Perry became governor. So what would the U.S. national debt look like after four (or eight) years of Rick Perry?
#4 Rick Perry has spearheaded the effort to lease roads in Texas to foreign companies, to turn roads that are already free to drive on into toll roads, and to develop the Trans-Texas Corridor which would be part of the planned NAFTA superhighway system. If you really do deep research on this whole Trans-Texas Corridor nonsense you will see why no American should ever cast a single vote for Rick Perry.
#5 Rick Perry claims that he has a “track record” of not raising taxes. That is a false claim. Rick Perry has repeatedly raised taxes and fees while he has been governor. Today, Texans are faced with significantly higher taxes and fees than they were before Rick Perry was elected.
#6 Even with the oil boom in Texas, 23 states have a lower unemployment rate than Texas does.
#7 Back in 1988, Rick Perry supported Al Gore for president. In fact, Rick Perry actually served as Al Gore’s campaign chairman in the state of Texas that year.
#8 Between December 2007 and April 2011, weekly wages in the U.S. increased by about 5 percent. In the state of Texas they increased by just 0.6% over that same time period.
#9 Texas now has one of the worst education systems in the nation. The following is from an opinion piece that was actually authored by Barbara Bush earlier this year….
• We rank 36th in the nation in high school graduation rates. An estimated 3.8 million Texans do not have a high school diploma.
• We rank 49th in verbal SAT scores, 47th in literacy and 46th in average math SAT scores.
• We rank 33rd in the nation on teacher salaries.
#10 Rick Perry attended the Bilderberg Group meetings in 2007 and 2011. Associating himself with that organization should be a red flag for all American voters.
#11 Texas has the highest percentage of workers making minimum wage out of all 50 states.
#12 Rick Perry often gives speeches about illegal immigration, but when you look at the facts, he has been incredibly soft on the issue. If Rick Perry does not plan to secure the border, then he should not be president because illegal immigration is absolutely devastating many areas of the southwest United States.
#13 In 2007, 221,000 residents of Texas were making minimum wage or less. By 2010, that number had risen to 550,000.
#14 Rick Perry actually issued an executive order in 2007 that would have forced almost every single girl in the state of Texas to receive the Gardasil vaccine before entering the sixth grade. Perry would have put parents in a position where they would have had to fill out an application and beg the government not to inject their child with an untested and unproven vaccine. Since then, very serious safety issues regarding this vaccine have come to light. Fortunately, lawmakers in Texas blocked what Perry was trying to do. According to Wikipedia, many were troubled when “apparent financial connections between Merck and Perry were reported by news outlets, such as a $ 6,000 campaign contribution and Merck’s hiring of former Perry Chief of Staff Mike Toomey to handle its Texas lobbying work.”
Texas is doing well because our state constitution limits the power of the governor, and our legislature only meets every two years (they somehow managed to write 1500 laws while in session last time, but you get my point).
Rick Perry is at least smart enough to ride the wave without screwing it up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









































